April 2016

S M T W T F S
     12
3456 789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Custom Text

Most Popular Tags

So twenty years ago (which in Hollywood years, dear reader, is about a century), the film that surprised everyone with its charm was 'The Princess Bride' by director Rob Reiner.

The film was nominated for a series of awards and won a few as well. It boosted several careers and cemented several characters and quotes in the public media consciousness. It's a film that serves the book well (it should, the author did the screenplay) and the book was quite brilliant and complex.

(more here...)
Tags:

(no subject)

Date: 2007-08-12 05:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] follybard.livejournal.com
Thank you for that. I saw Stardust on Friday and found it sweet and funny and charming and very entertaining, and look forward to seeing it again. But you've managed to articulate in a way that I hadn't, yet, why I still prefer Princess Bride: my favorite form of expression is satire.

(Thanks also for reminding me that I really should re-read that book....)

I will say this for Stardust, though: Michelle Pfeiffer is AWESOMENESS ON A STICK.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-08-12 06:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] arrefmak.livejournal.com
Michelle is fantastic.

I'm so sad that many, many reviewers go straight to "Michelle is so visually stunning" and seem to gloss her acting chops. I just listened to NPR's review where they had the nerve to say that Michelle makes the movie more believable 'because of how beautiful she is'.

I mean, give the gal some REAL credit why can't you.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-08-12 09:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] princejvstin.livejournal.com
Beauty is beside the point, especially because the high quality of her acting remains high throughout her appearance changes.

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Style Credit